On a whim, I ran my previous two posts through The Gender Genie, a site that purports to analyze text, and determine the sex of the author.
I admit that my samples were rather short, so it likely wasn't a fair test. Nevertheless, I found it amusing that it rated the first entry, the haiku-like thing, to be male-authored, while the second, the introduction, was female-authored. Yet, I wrote them both.
BTW, one of my pet peeves is the confusion, especially in the US, of gender and sex. If a person is talking about biology, female and male, she should use term is sex, because gender is primarily a grammatical term. Both words have lots of analagous uses, but somewhere a long the way, Americans have confused gender with sex, maybe out of a prudish fear of sex.
Of course, many say, with some justification, that, while most humans have a fixed sex, they can adopt different genders, that is, different sets of attributes which may or may not be associated with sex. I suspect that's the intent of The Gender Genie, and I recognize that it's simply a proof of concept and a fun toy.
I just ran the above through GG, and it rated it as strongly female (326 vs. 226 male). It considers "if", "not", and "and" to be female words.
07 April 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment